Managerial and Delegated Decision-Making Processes

The basic process for a manager when conducting a consultative or delegating the decision-making process

Consultation between managers and stakeholders in a firm is critical for proper coordination of activities. This is because what might seem minor to one individual may be a problem to another. Consultation entails listening to different views of employees before any decision is made. Any consultation that is done after a decision has been done is deception. However, it is important to note that consultation does not simply give in to the demands of employees. Nonetheless, whenever employees’ ideas are not included in the decision-making process, reasons should be provided.

The first basic that a manager should take into account is a decision with regard to the extent to which consultation should take place. Then, he or she should enlighten people on the content of the decision-making process. This will result in increased participation of employees in the decision-making process. Establish the law that should guide the process of discussion, which should be open to all members. The next basic is a creation of focus. This implies the intentions of the discussions. Identification of the relevant stakeholders is another basic that ensures that there is an easy flow of information to all stakeholders. Finally, it is important for a manager to develop an implementation strategy, indicating the methods, time, and materials to be used during the discussion.

Key considerations to keep in mind to be fair and consistent in a directive decision-making process

Business establishments’ administrators should promote fairness when making decisions to promote peaceful co-existence among the workers. First, consideration is equality employees. All of them should be subjected to equal treatment regardless of their interpersonal relationships with the manager. Transparency is another factor that would promote fairness and justice in decision-making. In this context, there must be fairness in resource allocation, i.e., distributive justice and justice should be done in relation to punishing the wrongs done, i.e., retributive justice. Another key consideration would be equal participation of all parties regardless of their race, economic background, and/or religious background

The advantages and disadvantages of group or delegation decision making

Advantages of the group decision-making process

First is the provision of detailed information and knowledge. This is because group members have various areas of specialization. Group members provide information that leads to the effective execution of the decision. This is because people, who would be implementing the decisions participated, or were represented in the group. This type of decision-making eliminates unfairness and the unreliability of the decisions that are made. Moreover, it is the foundation of training for employees who enhance the skills of analyzing information. Finally, it is more democratic compared with individual decision-making processes.

Disadvantages of group decision making

It takes a lot of time. This is because different people need to be assembled in order to make a judgment. There could be personal interests among members, which could hinder the decision-making process. Notably, some participants would just agree due to influence from other members. It is possible for a group to concentrate on a few provided options, ignoring others, although they could be equally important. An agreement reached by group members might not focus on achieving the firm’s objectives, leading to poor performance outcomes.

Considerations to keep in mind when meeting with someone to address a performance issue

It is vital to ensure that the main themes are not overlooked. It is important to prepare members adequately for them to participate in the discussion with the visitor. The process should be well structured to facilitate efficiency and good performance outcomes. The objective of addressing the issues should be considered. Nonetheless, the resources that might be required should be availed.

Thus, from the discussion above, it is evident that the roles played by organizations’ managers are crucial in increasing their output. A good relationship between managers and the subordinate is crucial. Moreover, there is a need to engage subordinates in the decision-making process.