Quality management system
It is vital to mention that the main objective of quality management in organizations is to ensure that services and goods offered are of the desired quality. Therefore, suppliers benefit from impressive returns as customers are satisfied. The motive of instilling quality management should be aimed at ensuring that relatively high quality of goods and services are provided.
I agree with the argument that for an organization to manage quality successfully, emphasis should be put on setting guidelines that will ensure adequate responsiveness and efficiency in operations to achieve and maintain quality rather than having a system that focuses on identifying flaws and weaknesses in finished products. It is true to reiterate that quality management is achieved when quality standards are set alongside organizational objectives. Hence, the two elements should be integrated.
Differences between a quality manual and a quality system
It is valid to mention that a quality manual is a basic and elementary tool that outlines the standards that are supposed to be upheld by administrators and planners of organizations similar to those discussed in this specific post. It is however critical to note that a quality manual contains data that transpires into the whole quality management process in any organization. On the other hand, a quality system is the interplay of all the aspects that are systematically put into a position to ensure the incorporation of the specifications of the ISO 9001:2000 clause used in international standardization of operations.
It is not realistic enough to separate quality manuals and quality systems since it is evident that the latter is just an implementation of the former. The quality manual and the quality system are all applied in organizations simultaneously to ensure accountability and responsibility in procedural practices and are therefore not two separate entities with different resourcefulness in quality assurance.
Demand for standardization of Quality Management System
It is reasonable to concur with the notion that standardization of quality management systems has been invaluable and very much called for. This is necessary not just in the production sector but also in all sectors and industries where goods and services are being produced and sold to consumers. It is true to say that the consumer fraternity has benefited from this standardization because they have been well informed on what is of high and low quality through the internet.
The manufacturers have also embarked on the production of quality products since quality ratings have been made clear to all by the use of modern technology. It is indeed factual that consumers’ demand for quality is rising in every sector. It is evident that as the need for demand keeps on rising, companies have borrowed the idea of using their quality systems together with standardized systems to ensure that the quality of products remains optimal. The quality of the data and information available in a company’s information system determines the quality of the company’s products and not vice versa.
Importance of quality control and quality assurance
It is quite evident that high competition in the global manufacturing industry has been coupled with rising in consumers’ emphasis on the quality of the goods availed in the market. It is true that in the current highly competitive market, it is only those companies who have extensive control of quality are successful. Quality control ensures that a company has a consistent supply of reliable goods or services which satisfy the preferences of consumers.
For companies to achieve quality assurance, they have to engage the services of well-skilled human resources. They should also equip their quality control and quality assurance departments with the necessary modern technology. It is a fact that when a company does not produce standardized products it does not realize a good number of returns both inwards and outwards.
Environmental Auditing & ISO 19011: The Scope
The highlighted scope of the ISO 19011 environmental auditing strategies and corporative standards is indeed satisfactory. There are cited normative terms, auditing terms, personnel, audit documentation, and arrangements that are necessary when monitoring quality. The standards body should ensure that audit reports and evidence are available after the whole exercise is accomplished in the right way.
Among the critical ISO 19011 auditing principles, we have behavioral standards and due professionalism. There is also the use of an independent evidence-based approach of reporting the found standards. The exercise should also be transparent and demonstrate high levels of accountability so that the desired outcomes are achieved as per the set goals.
The Benefits of ISO-9000
The findings noted in this post bear optimal truth on the merits of the ISO-9000 certification. Although the benefits accrued from the ISO-9000 have been quite controversial, these are valid examples. The exercise leaves an organization with a clear guideline on how future improvements can be done. The organization is provided with a basis of operational procedures and this leads to increase inefficiency. Hence, quality production is realized at a lower cost. Besides, corrective measures come with ISO-9000, and employee enthusiasm is boosted as individuals work with minimal supervision. Communication is improved, quality is enhanced and profit levels are also optimized.